Compartilhar
Informação da revista
Vol. 99. Núm. 4.
Páginas 618-621 (1 julho 2024)
Compartilhar
Compartilhar
Baixar PDF
Mais opções do artigo
Visitas
2716
Vol. 99. Núm. 4.
Páginas 618-621 (1 julho 2024)
Letter - Clinical
Acesso de texto completo
Lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei with extra-facial involvement in a 6-year-old Japanese girl
Visitas
2716
Misaki Kusano
Autor para correspondência
k963@fmu.ac.jp

Corresponding author.
, Maki Takada, Natsuko Matsumura, Toshiyuki Yamamoto
Department of Dermatology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
Este item recebeu
Informação do artigo
Texto Completo
Bibliografia
Baixar PDF
Estatísticas
Figuras (3)
Mostrar maisMostrar menos
Tabelas (1)
Table 1. Cases of vulvar involvement in childhood Lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei and childhood granulomatous periorificial dermatitis.
Texto Completo
Dear Editor,

Lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei (LMDF) predominantly occurs at 20–30 years of age and is rarely seen in children. We report a pediatric case of LMDF affecting the face and the labia majora.

A 6-year-old Japanese girl was referred to our department, complaining of a 5-month history of pruritic papular eruptions on the face. She had been treated with oral antiallergic drugs and topical corticosteroids, but without effects. Physical examination showed numerous 1‒2 mm dome-shaped small reddish papulonodules around the mouth and lower eyelids (Fig. 1 A and B). In addition, reddish papules were scattered in the labia majora (Fig. 2). A skin biopsy was carried out from papular eruptions on the right jaw. Histological examination revealed dermal epithelioid cell granulomas without caseous necrosis (Fig. 3A). Magnified epithelioid cell granuloma images showed multinucleated giant cells in the dermis (Fig. 3B), as well as inflammatory lymphocytic and histiocytic infiltration around the granulomas and hair follicles area. Immunostaining was positive for CD68 and CD163 antigens (Fig. 3 C and D). A tuberculin test was negative. Treatment with oral administration of clarithromycin showed favorable effects on the vulvar lesions after 5 months and the facial lesions after 9 months.

Figure 1.

Numerous small erythematous papules were located on the lower eyelid (A) and around the mouth (B).

(0.19MB).
Figure 2.

Reddish papules were scattered in the labia majora.

(0.22MB).
Figure 3.

Histopathological features showing epithelioid cell granulomas within the dermis (A). Higher magnification reveals epithelioid cell granulomas containing multinucleated giant cells (B). Immunohistochemistry revealed positive findings for CD68 (C) and CD163 (D).

(1.1MB).

The present case developed multiple palpebral and perioral papulonodular lesions, which are the frequently involved sites of LMDF. In addition, vulvar involvement was observed. The patient did not have any organ symptoms suggestive of juvenile-onset sarcoidosis. Granulomatous rosacea was excluded, because neither facial erythema nor telangiectasia was observed, and the patient denied flushing.

Clinical and pathological features of pediatric LMDF are slightly different from adult LMDF, such as i) Papules concentrated around the mouth, on the nasolabial fold, and on the lower eyelids, ii) Small papule size, iii) Few pustules and scarring, iv) Redness around the mouth, v) Few caseous necrosis within epithelioid granulomas, and vi) Short clinical course.1 On the other hand, Childhood Granulomatous Periorificial Dermatitis (CGPD) was reported as a disease in which yellow-brown papular eruptions limited to the perioral, perinasal, and periocular regions that histopathologically show epithelioid cell granulomas around hair follicles.2 The features of LMDF in childhood are highly similar to those of CGPD, and differentiation of both disorders is challenging and possibly both disorders are the same entity.1

There are several cases of LMDF with extra-facial involvement in sites such as the neck, axilla, groin, and extremities. Genital regions are also affected, and to our knowledge, there are only four reported cases of this involvement in childhood LMDF (1 case) and CGPD (3 cases) (Table 1).3,4 The age of onset was 6–9 years, and all cases were girls. They were successfully treated with oral minocycline, topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, oral and topical erythromycin, topical metronidazole, topical tacrolimus, and topical metronidazole.4,5 Treatment response is better in pediatric LMDF than in adult cases. In pediatric cases of LMDF, genital areas should be examined in detail.

Table 1.

Cases of vulvar involvement in childhood Lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei and childhood granulomatous periorificial dermatitis.

Author and year of publication  Disease  Age in years  Gender  Clinical features  Treatment  Treatment duration 
Wataeda et al. (1990)  LMDF in children  Female  Face, labia majora  Oral minocycline, topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug  3 mo and a half 
Andry et al. (1995)  CGPD  Unknown  Female  Face, perivulvar  Unknown  Unknown 
Amy et al. (2002)  CGPD  Female  Face, labia majora  Oral and topical erythromycin  2 mo 
Amy et al. (2002)  CGPD  Female  Face, arms, abdomen, labia majora  Oral erythromycin, topical metronidazole  Unknown 
Financial support

None declared.

Authors’ contributions

Misaki Kusano: Approval of the final version of the manuscript; critical literature review; data collection; analysis and interpretation; study conception and planning; management of studied cases; manuscript critical review; preparation and writing of the manuscript.

Maki Takada: Approval of the final version of the manuscript; critical literature review; manuscript critical review; preparation and writing of the manuscript.

Natsuko Matsumura: Approval of the final version of the manuscript; critical literature review; manuscript critical review; preparation and writing of the manuscript.

Toshiyuki Yamamoto: Approval of the final version of the manuscript; critical literature review; data collection; analysis and interpretation; study conception and planning; manuscript critical review; preparation and writing of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

References
[1]
N. Misago, J. Nakafusa, Y. Narisawa.
Childhood granulomatous periorificial dermatitis: lupus miliaris disseminatus faciei in children?.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol., 19 (2005), pp. 470-473
[2]
A. Fakih, R. Makhoul, I. Grozdev.
Childhood granulomatous periorificial dermatitis: case report and review of the literature.
Dermatol Online J., 26 (2020),
[3]
P. Andry, C. Bodemer, D. Teillac-Hamel, S. Fraitag, Y. DeProst.
Granulomatous perioral dermatitis in childhood: eight cases [abstract].
Pediatr Dermatol., 12 (1995), pp. 76
[4]
A.J. Urbatsch, I. Frieden, M.L. Williams, B.E. Elewski, A.J. Mancini, A.S. Paller.
Extrafacial and generalized granulomatous periorificial dermatitis.
Arch Dermatol., 138 (2002), pp. 1354-1358
[5]
M. Hatanaka, T. Kanekura.
Case of childhood granulomatous periorificial dermatitis.
J Dermatol., 45 (2018), pp. e256-e257

Study conducted at the Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.

Baixar PDF
Idiomas
Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia (Portuguese)
Opções de artigo
Ferramentas
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.